Kepmendagri No 32 of 2011 should be reviewed (by Andri Luntungan)

Kemendagri 32 that regulates the financial and social assistance grants sourced from angaran revenue and expenditure there was still need for consideration by the Finance

Minister's decision collides with N0 13, it is seen by the
Negri also minister to interfere in the decision problem occurs in the field ultimately finance minister laments the poor dipedalaman.Persoalan the poor is not new that in the provision of the bailout seemed to need a bailout, but when it began to be set to not based on the results surpai will also make deepened the suffering of the poor, meaning that many poor people in different areas often have to be assisted by way of spontaneity because of the rules Kepmendagri N0 32 stipulates that every assistance should be submitted together with the annual angaran and not tactical funds must be spent every moment and every poor person should be sick blades filed a month means the bar there are sick people in the immediate aid funds will be assisted in agaran quarterly or annual angaran possible that there are blades of poor sick people dying dubantunya sangant must wait a month or three months? see the author considers this rule Kepmendagri N032 in 2011 to the review and it would be better if the Minister does not need to intervene on its territory the rules rather than finance minister would not have made the rules governing the grant penguanaan N013 and social aid in Negri why ministers are also invited to make N0 32 of 2011 that it actually burdensome to the poor sick area. Seeing all of these authors appealed to the Minister keauangan immediately take a stand to hold a coordination of the Home Affairs minister in order not to interfere in the affairs of the Menku, therefore areas will overlap? they must keep the rules which one? seandaianya ikutpulah Minister make rules regarding the use of funds in each region and the rules that are already running should be how to withdraw that rule back? The results of field observations of the author Kepmendagri rule N0 32 of 2011 does not seem to correspond to N0 13 Kepmenku jela and there's already a full policy means that every region should use tactical fund with a record of all activity expenses must be listed in the program activities and whether the rules Kepmenku peruntukanya.Pertanyaannya N0 13 considered to be less severe? considered weak or Minister of Finance to make laws, or munkin Affairs Minister in regard to her smarter than the Minister of Finance to enter into so-shutter Menku rules? Blades it is possible we can imagine must stick to the rules under which one? Writer's observation in the field what diktakan poor that they are difficult to get a tactical aid hapir closer to the truth, that they say "whether the Home Affairs Minister when making the rules in 2011 was based surfai 32 or so he was limited to looking face said ahmad 40 years of poor Warakas living in jakarta? " what they dikataan sebanarnya not contrived but is a feeling that senduh and suffering and this is not just complain about the poor dijakarta but throughout the entire area of ​​Indonesia that has the same poor people saying "they were disappointed by the Regulatory Kepmendagri Sangay N0 32 of 2011 , therefore the rules make aeluruh poor people suffer even more, secant-going Minister of Home Affairs made a rule not based on the results of surfai atu made possible from others who do not understand the actual conditions? said Muksin villagers seine sari Jawabarat "Hearing this coletehan adkah touched? Observation while the authors of the Regulation Kepmendagri N032 are already approved and already outstanding in every area of ​​public penkajian stidaknya there needs to be touched because of regulatory intent of the poor throughout Indoneia hidupp regulations if it contains elements of damning the poor throughout the region with strict pemrintah minister should immediately memamnggil Negri to re mengkajih in that rule, and should DPRI and Finance Mntri assisted by a team of experts to review again whether the rules should be reviewed Kepmendagri it or what? Despite all that the authors expect if Kemendagri N0 32 was repealed may be no impact. And more authors agreed with Minister of Finance Regulation N0 13 whose content is clearly mengaandung financial asministrasi element rather than the rule N0 32 of didalanya not reflect Shittim makes good financial risk constraint for poor people diInonesia, it will even reflect the resentment of the poor and the effect is touching to Sitem pemrintahan a capable, meaning it has been disappointing Kepmendagri regulations poor people in Indonesia and there, eventually people say that Indonesia is why like this? Seeing all of these authors hope that the government can take the attitude of the Minister to explain the meaning of the rules and has been the extent to which its interests and its meaning, if the rules were made to kepantingan jutru Government or the government would drop the name of the fragrance? bar rule that ultimately make the poor more miserable it can be said to bring fragrant munkinkah Pemirinta? jawanmya tidak.jika not rule it would be nice if you need immediate re dikajih rules on deferred until the time limit may not be determined.